Archive Page 53
Scientific Jargon
“과학 논문에 나오는 관용어구들”
웃기면서도 속으론 뜨끔하게 만드는 내용들 ㅎㅎ
< Scientific Jargon >
by Dyrk Schingman, Oregon State University
After several years of studying and hard work, I have finally learned scientific jargon. The following list of phrases and their definitions will help you to
understand that mysterious language of science and medicine.
IT HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN
I didn’t look up the original reference.
A DEFINITE TREND IS EVIDENT
These data are practically meaningless.
WHILE IT HAS NOT BEEN POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE DEFINITE ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS
An unsuccessful experiment, but I still hope to get it published.
THREE OF THE SAMPLES WERE CHOOSEN FOR DETAILED STUDY
The other results didn’t make any sense.
TYPICAL RESULTS ARE SHOWN
This is the prettiest graph.
THESE RESULTS WILL BE IN A SUBSEQUENT REPORT
I might get around to this sometime, if pushed/funded.
THE MOST RELIABLE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED BY JONES
He was my graduate student; his grade depended on this.
IN MY EXPERINCE
once
IN CASE AFTER CASE
Twice
IN A SERIES OF CASES
Thrice
IT IS BELIEVED THAT
I think.
IT IS GENERALLY BELIEVED THAT
A couple of other guys think so too.
CORRECT WITHIN AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE
Wrong.
ACCORDING TO STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Rumor has it.
A STATISTICALLY ORIENTED PROJECTION OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE FINDINGS
A wild guess.
A CAREFUL ANALYSIS OF OBTAINABLE DATA
Three pages of notes were obliterated when I knocked over a glass of beer.
IT IS CLEAR THAT MUCH ADDITIONAL WORK WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THIS PHENOMENA OCCURS
I don’t understand it.
AFTER ADDITIONAL STUDY BY MY COLLEAGUES
They don’t understand it either.
THANKS ARE DUE TO JOE BLOTZ FOR ASSISTANCE WITH THE EXPERIMENT AND TO ANDREA SCHAEFFER FOR VALUABLE DISCUSSIONS
Mr. Blotz did the work and Ms. Shaeffer explained to me what it meant.
A HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT AREA FOR EXPLORATORY STUDY
A totally useless topic selected by my committee.
IT IS HOPED THAT THIS STUDY WILL STIMULATE FURTHER INVESTIGATION IN THIS FIELD
I quit.
This may be used or broadcast in any form as long as I receive credit.
Military Spending

From The Economist.
http://www.economist.com/daily/chartgallery/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9133342
The Republic of Korea spent 2.6% of GDP in 2005. Some politicians are now trying to make it over 3%.
보통 sex에 관한 battle이라면 자신의 씨를 뿌리기 위한 수컷들끼리의 경쟁을 생각하게 되는데 그러한 상식을 깨는 흥미로운(조금은 민망스러운) 기사이다.
과학 전문지가 아니라 조금 미심쩍기는 하지만 이 정도 수준의 잡지라면 검증되지 않은 내용을 기재하지는 않았을 테니…
RSS

